What if you could be sued for your genealogy research – even if it were true? This is what happened to one of the authors of Weird Ohio which published a true story about one Ohio family’s history. And a descendant brought a “false light” lawsuit against the authors.
A Genealogy Ghost Story
Making this long story short: a segment of the book recounted a mass murder by a family member and resulting ghost legends/stories at the location. The plaintiff in the suit contended that such information caused visitors and “ghost hunters” to trespass on the properly and and bring “unreasonable publicity to one’s private life.” You can read more about the lawsuit at the Oxford University Press USA website. The Ohio Court of Appeals site has a recent opinion (opens in PDF) from 23 December 2009.
What isn’t clear even from my reading of the court papers is whether such a murder did in fact take place. The issue seems to be the resulting “legend” and “stories” about the haunting of the location.
Could I Be Sued For Factually Correct Genealogy Research?
I don’t stay awake at night worrying about this but I guess it could happen if I were to add legends and mythology to a family history which can’t be proven through the Genealogical Proof Standard. As a professional genealogist, I would want to – as Joe Friday would say – “just state the facts ma’am.”
It is one thing to make a conclusion as to relationships, offspring, etc. It is another thing to try and validate local legends or family stories. Care should be taken to document any “family stories” as to their source if they are used to “round out” research. There are often living descendants who may not agree with the depiction of their ancestors. Keeping to the facts – proven and properly sourced via citations – can help avoid any misunderstandings as to an interpretation of family history.
* * *
Thanks to Mike Brubaker of History by Brubaker for alerting me and other genealogy bloggers to the recent lawsuit.
©2010, copyright Thomas MacEntee